Skip to Main Content

News

NEWS

Dinse Welcomes New Litigation Attorney

Dinse is pleased to announce that Andrew Sullivan has joined the firm as an associate attorney.

Andrew is a member of the firm’s litigation group, and provides support and counseling in a variety of areas, including personal injury, insurance defense, medical malpractice, employment, and education, among others. Prior to joining the firm, he was a judicial law clerk for the Rutland Unit of the Vermont Superior Court. Andrew graduated from the University of Richmond School of Law, where he served as Copy Editor for the Richmond Journal of Law and Technology.

NEWS

New England Super Lawyers Recognizes Thirteen Dinse Attorneys

Dinse P.C. announces that eleven attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2018 New England Super Lawyers list in six different practice areas, and two attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2018 New England Rising Stars list.  Attorneys are identified as “Super Lawyers” based on extensive nomination and polling among New England attorneys aimed at identifying New England’s top attorneys in each class. Attorneys are identified as being “Rising Stars” based on extensive nomination and polling among New England attorneys who are asked to nominate the best attorneys who are 40 or under, or who have been practicing for 10 years or less.

The practice areas and the attorney(s) listed in each area for the 2018 New England Super Lawyers list are as follows:

  • Business Litigation: Ritchie Berger, Karen McAndrew
  • Business/Corporate Law: Jeffrey McMahan, Brian Murphy, Afi Ahmadi, David Gurtman
  • Employment & Labor Law: Jeffrey Nolan
  • Estate Planning & Probate: Mark Langan
  • Health Care Law: Linda Cohen
  • Real Estate Law: Molly Langan, Austin Hart

The practice areas and attorneys listed for the 2018 New England Rising Stars list is as follows:

  • Civil Litigation: Defense: Andy MacIlwaine
  • Civil Litigation: Plaintiff: Kendall Hoechst
NEWS

Audio of discussion regarding draft of OCR Notice of Proposed Rulemaking available for download

On September 14, 2018, the National Association of College and University Attorneys (“NACUA”) posted a draft copy of the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights’ (“OCR”) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.  The draft Notice outlines many potential changes in how OCR will enforce Title IX, including changes to the definition of sexual harassment, the scope of institutional obligations to address sexual harassment, and how institutions should respond to sexual harassment. The draft Notice is available here: https://www.nacua.org/docs/default-source/new-cases-and-developments/2018/draft-title-ix-regulations-september-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=118374be_2. In posting the document, NACUA emphasized that: “The draft Notice is currently undergoing review in the Office of Management and Budget.  This is not a final copy of the Proposed Rules, but we wanted to make the draft available to members in light of the significance of the forthcoming regulations and the expected release of the draft in various news outlets.”

On September 17, 2018, Jeffrey J. Nolan, Chair of Dinse’s Education Practice Group, presented a webinar regarding the language and implications of the draft Notice. An audio recording of that webinar is available here: Part 1Part 2.

Please contact Jeff Nolan at jnolan@dinse.com if you have any follow-up questions. Thank you.

DINSE BRIEF

Dinse Brief: Qualified Opportunity Zones

By Ted Lawrence

Background

To encourage investment in low-income communities, the Tax Cut and Jobs Act created a new section of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 USC § 1400Z, that address investments made in “Qualified Opportunity Zones.”

What are Qualified Opportunity Zones?

Qualified Opportunity Zones are specific geographic areas that have been designated as such by the U.S. Treasury Department.  Earlier this year, the U.S. Treasury Secretary certified a number of Vermont towns and neighborhoods as Qualified Opportunity Zones.  The certified areas include Winooski, parts of Burlington and South Burlington, Vergennes, and Rutland.  Investing in a Qualified Opportunity Zone may provide significant tax benefits to an investor.

Benefits

Investment in a Qualified Opportunity Fund provides three potential tax advantages to the investor:

  1. A deferral of tax on gains that are invested.
  2. Partial forgiveness of tax due with respect to those gains.
  3. A basis step-up on those gains.

In addition, investment in a Qualified Opportunity Fund allows investors to receive favorable tax treatment on real-estate investments without actually owning or managing the development of real property (unlike, for example, a 1031 exchange property).

Investment Process

Investment in a Qualified Opportunity Zone is made through a tiered structure.  There are three different types of entities and properties involved in the process:

  • Qualified Opportunity Zone Funds;
  • Qualified Opportunity Zone Businesses; and
  • Qualified Opportunity Zone Business Property.

Qualified Opportunity Fund

A Qualified Opportunity Fund is the umbrella entity through which all investments in the Qualified Opportunity Zone program must be made.  A Qualified Opportunity Fund must:

  • Hold at least 90 percent of its assets in “qualified opportunity zone property”—i.e., the stock or interests of a Qualified Opportunity Zone Business, or Qualified Opportunity Zone Business Property.
  • Not make investments in another Qualified Opportunity Fund.
  • Make certain tax filings.

Qualified Opportunity Zone Business

A Qualified Opportunity Zone Business is an entity that owns and operates “tangible property”—i.e., real estate or personal property—in a Qualified Opportunity Zone.  It is the entity that actually performs the development work in a Qualified Opportunity Zone.  A Qualified Opportunity Zone Business must meet the following requirements:

  • “Substantially all” of the tangible property owned by the Business must be Qualified Opportunity Zone Business Property.
  • Follow certain statutory standards detailed in other sections of the Internal Revenue Code.
  • Not function as a “sin business”—e.g., owning golf courses, liquor stores, massage or hot tub parlors, or tanning salons.

Qualified Opportunity Zone Business Property

Qualified Opportunity Zone Business property is tangible property that is:

  • Acquired by the Qualified Opportunity Fund or Business after December 31, 2017.
  • “Originally acquired” (i.e., a new investment) or “substantially improved” (i.e., becomes more highly valued) by the Qualified Opportunity Fund or Business.

Unanswered Questions

There are a number of unanswered questions regarding investments in Qualified Opportunity Zones, including:

  • Whether the deferral and forgiveness on “gains” invested in a Qualified Opportunity Fund refers to all gains or just capital
  • The meaning of “substantially improve” in the context of Qualified Opportunity Zone Business Property.
  • How the basis step-up on gains invested in a Qualified Opportunity Fund will be calculated.
  • Whether Qualified Opportunity Funds and Qualified Opportunity Zone Businesses may organize as LLCs.

The U.S. Treasury and Internal Revenue Service are likely to issue further guidelines on investing in Qualified Opportunity Zones in the near future.  We will send a further update when such guidance is issued.

NEWS

Best Lawyers Recognizes Thirteen Dinse Attorneys

Dinse P.C. announces that thirteen of its attorneys were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in the The Best Lawyers in America® 2019 (Copyright 2012 by Woodward/White, Inc., of Aiken, S.C.) in twenty different practice areas. Since it was first published in 1983, Best Lawyers has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence. Because Best Lawyers is based on an exhaustive peer-review survey in which more than 36,000 leading attorneys cast almost 4.4 million votes on the legal abilities of other lawyers in their practice areas, and because lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be listed, inclusion in Best Lawyers is considered a singular honor. Corporate Counsel magazine has called Best Lawyers “the most respected referral list of attorneys in practice.”

The practice areas and the attorney(s) listed in each area are as follows:

  • Commercial Litigation: Ritchie E. Berger, Karen McAndrew
  • Corporate Compliance Law: David Gurtman
  • Corporate Governance Law: Brian Murphy
  • Corporate Law: Jeffrey J. McMahan, Brian R. Murphy
  • Education Law: Jeffrey J. Nolan, Karen McAndrew
  • Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law: Daniel R. Sharpe
  • Employment Law – Management: Amy M. McLaughlin, Jeffrey J. Nolan, Karen McAndrew
  • Immigration Law: Leigh Cole
  • Litigation – Construction: Karen McAndrew
  • Litigation – Intellectual Property: Shapleigh Smith, Jr., Karen McAndrew
  • Litigation – Labor & Employment: Amy M. McLaughlin
  • Medical Malpractice Law – Defendants: Ritchie E. Berger
  • Mergers & Acquisitions Law: Brian R. Murphy
  • Non-Profit / Charities Law: Brian R. Murphy
  • Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants: Ritchie E. Berger, Karen McAndrew
  • Product Liability Litigation – Defendants: Shapleigh Smith, Jr.
  • Real Estate Law: Austin D. Hart, Molly Langan
  • Tax Law: Mark A. Langan
  • Technology Law: Jeffrey J. McMahan
  • Trusts and Estates: Mark A. Langan
NEWS

Dinse Contributes to Chambers & Partners’ USA: Regional Real Estate 2018 Guide

Dinse attorneys Molly Langan, Jess Phelps, James Langan, and Brian Murphy, contributed to the Vermont section of Chambers and Partners’ USA: Regional Real Estate guide. The USA: Regional Real Estate guide provides expert legal commentary on the key issues for businesses involved in the real estate sector. The guide covers the important developments in the most significant jurisdictions. You can view Dinse’s contribution here.

NEWS

Dinse Announces Two New Directors and Shareholders of the Firm

Dinse is pleased to announce that Maggie Platzer and Justin Barnard have been elected as Directors and Shareholders of the firm.

Maggie Platzer joined the firm in October 2011 after acting as Assistant General Counsel and Privacy Officer at Delta Dental of Massachusetts in Boston.  Her practice focuses primarily on employee health and retirement benefits, and healthcare compliance.  Maggie helps employers understand their compliance obligations when managing and reporting health coverage, self-insuring employee health benefits, and management of their 401(k), 403(b) or other retirement plans.  She also advises healthcare providers as to their compliance obligations under HIPAA and other privacy laws.

Justin Barnard joined the firm in July 2014 after serving as a lead litigator in the Maine Attorney General’s Office for the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, and prior to that as a law clerk for the Honorable Kermit Lipez on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Justin’s practice focuses primarily on representing clients before federal and state trial courts, appeals courts, and administrative bodies. He has represented clients in a wide range of industries and contexts, from solar development to professional malpractice.

PUBLICATION

Jess Phelps Publishes Article on Agricultural Conservation Easements in Ecology Law Quarterly

Jess Phelps of Dinse’s Real Estate and Environmental groups recently published an article, Defining the Role of Conservation in Agricultural Conservation Easements, in Ecology Law Quarterly, the environmental law review published by the University of California-Berkeley.  This article focuses on the challenges of balancing the environmental protection of these lands against the need for these agricultural properties to have operational flexibility, with specific suggestions regarding how to encourage better conservation outcomes. This article is available for download, here.

NEWS

Dinse Welcomes New Attorneys

Dinse, Knapp & McAndrew is pleased to announce that Jess Phelps, Sara Huddleston and Michael Thomas have joined the firm as associate attorneys.

Jess is a member of the firm’s real estate group.  Prior to joining the firm, he was an attorney at the United States Department of Agriculture, Office of General Counsel, Natural Resources and Environment Division in Washington, D.C., where he primarily worked on land conservation transactions involving the Natural Resources Conservation Service (“NRCS”) and Forest Service. He graduated from Drake University School of Law where he served Editor in Chief of the Drake Law Review.

Sara is a member of the firm’s business group and her practice involves a variety of corporate and nonprofit transactions, including drafting agreements and advising clients on corporate governance. She graduated from Boston College Law School where she served as a research assistant to Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Luís Roberto Barroso and Professor Paulo Barrozo. Sara also helped Professor Sharon Beckman, Director of the Boston College Innocence Program, establish a program to address the re-entry needs of exonerees.

Michael is a member of the firm’s business group and provides legal support to start-ups and established companies in all aspects of their business operations. Prior to joining the firm, he assisted startup companies in the Boston area by drafting licensing and operating agreements while working in the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Clinic at Boston College Law School. Michael graduated from Boston College Law School where he served as Managing Editor for the Boston College Intellectual Property and Technology Forum Journal.